|
|
|
|
|
|
by probably_wrong
2107 days ago
|
|
|
If Murray's account is to be believed, it is the court's fault that no other sources are reporting on this: > Once again, there were just five of us in the public gallery (in 42 seats) and the six allowed in the overflow video gallery in court 9 was reduced to three, as three seats were reserved by the court for “VIPs” who did not show up. If there are exactly 8 journalists present, three of which can't ever hear well (from yesterday, "(6 others) were shunted into the adjacent court 9 where a very small number were permitted to squint at a tiny screen, on which the sound was so inaudible John Pilger simply left"), that only leaves 4 other voices to present this story. I will gladly read other accounts if they are available, but I will not be holding my breath. |
|
|