[OnWriting]

  > ...answer to the question of why we read, there is only one response that will ever be encompassing and ambitious enough: we read in order to know everything

Anecdotally, there's a large amount of people who will read a book wholly for the purpose of being able to say they've read it. Whether it's a sense of elitism, vanity or bits of both -- it's strikingly obvious when you ask deeper questions about a book and they can only respond with basic one sentences you could infer from the synopsis.

I believe the above has been amplified due to the false dichotomy of information technology vs good ol' books.

[im3w1l]

> it's strikingly obvious when you ask deeper questions about a book and they can only respond with basic one sentences you could infer from the synopsis.

When I watch movies with some people they will be "I think I didn't see this one before". And then half way in, they are like "oh I remember this, I did watch it after all". Some people are just forgetful.

[watwut]

They might just not remember. I used to read the same book many times and still have fun, because when I fully immersed myself and enjoyed it, I often ended up not remember a lot. I still enjoyed the experience of reading.