Geez. It's pretty tasteless to compare a political freedom movement to opposing some restrictive terms of service. It's like putting a picture of Thích Quảng Đức on your blog about why DRM is bad.
I'm sorry if you find this tasteless and I'll expand a bit more in case there is misunderstanding. My point is that too much power in the hands of anyone is a bad idea that should be opposed. Doesn't matter if it's a country, a political party, a company the size of a country or simply a person with huge funds. Not opposing such behavior amounts to supporting them. I don't like the way Epic does it... but I respect that they do it somehow against their best interest.
I think that comparison is somewhat flawed. 1984 is a fictional novel, not a real political movement or historical event. No real people were harmed by the events in 1984.
The Arab spring started because police confiscated the produce of a street vendor operating without a permit.
Granted, there aren't many people that would self-immolate over Apple's terms of service, but the point is that economic freedom is still an important political freedom that people are willing to die over.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedro_Albizu_Campos