|
|
|
|
|
by nijave
2114 days ago
|
|
Yup and something rarely mentioned is lack of good testing frameworks and all the pitfalls when you try to make something portable I will admit Python doesn't have great, simple primitives for shell-like tasks but you can create a few functions to make a simple sh("") wrapper. With Ruby's backtick execution syntax you can blend in shell/system utilities pretty easily. Unfortunately, Ruby isn't installed on as many systems by default, afaik Here's a Ruby equivalent of looping through mp3 files in the current directory ``` Dir["*.mp3"].each do |file| puts file # print the file name
end``` |
|