|
|
|
|
|
|
by garmaine
2118 days ago
|
|
|
> Which nation refuses to sign more international treaties than any other and is actively working to retroactively disengage and absolve themselves of the responsibility they signed up for? Hint: It's not China. "American space policy is not like other American foreign policy" As to restrictions against China, blame Congress not NASA. But the bans are not blanket bans, they are actually highly specific. |
|
|
What does that even mean?
If I am selling food so expensive that no one can afford and start to dying from starving, then I can say: "I am not not allow you to eat, it's just that my price is highly specific?"
Do you really think regulations are not pushing away competitions because of the investment needed to overcome the numerous details? Would that same logic apply to your "highly specific" rules?
Like, you invested 1Billion, oh sorry, I cannot let you have this piece of tech, because of this rules; and I certainly forgot that this rules apply to this tech...