| Edit: I read OP’s argument the wrong way. So my comment below is based on a misapprehension. ———- This is foolish. BMI is used to estimate population averages. But waist measure is vastly better. Someone with a waist of 31 at 5’6” actually has close to ideal portions, if you’re talking about a man. (For women you need the hip measure too). That’s a waist to height ratio of about .47. A person with that waist probably has a high muscle mass + low body fat. Now, if the same person was 155, 5’6” and had a 34 inch waist, they are almost certainly overweight. https://trustyspotter.com/blog/perfect-male-body-measurement...
https://www.omnicalculator.com/health/Waist_Height Both people will show up as “overweight” in population averages, which isn’t an issue as edge cases balance out over the whole population. But you’re talking as though such a person with a 31 inch waist should actually lose weight. |
No, I'm not. I never said such a thing and I have no idea why you're building such a strawman.
Waist measure has nothing to do with this story. This story is about COVID-19 comorbidities, of which being overweight (which is medically measured using BMI, not waist measures) is one. BMI is all that matters in this context.
If you are 5'6" and 155 lbs, you are classified as overweight and thus are considered a high-risk person for COVID-19. That has nothing to do with "you should/should not lose weight".
And the broader point is this: if you see any stats saying "most COVID-19 deaths were overweight people", you shouldn't feel any sense of "safety" because you think "well I'm not overweight, I wear size small!", because there's a good chance that a lot of those COVID deaths wore smalls, too.