|
|
|
|
|
by slexaxton
5543 days ago
|
|
Mostly agreed, and well articulated. Though, the point I believe that Tom was trying to make about Diaz having to ask Thomas to change things was more valid with the links that were likely stripped from your comment: https://github.com/madrobby/emile/pull/7 While you already argue against something like ender.js being valid, Tom's argument, which preceded your comment (and which seemed confirmed by Thomas' post, imo), was that including emile in Ender.js has actually been a pain because he couldn't get Thomas to answer him, let alone change something for him. I believe the irony that was being pointed out was that Thomas then gave ender a shout-out after ignoring it (from an outside and likely wrong perspective). I say all of this in more of a objective bystander, rather than someone who wants to interject his own opinion on the actual topic. I don't need that kind of stress. Full disclosure: I found myself quite attracted to Thomas the few times I met him. I think it's the accent. |
|
Dustin wanted a different API to call upon, so he had to change some stuff, again relatively easy, because it basically fits on a screen in a text editor.
Let's not forget, all of this is open source, and it's meant for adaptation, forking and to be built upon. (Note that Emile was very much a proof-of-concept, with no emphasis on beatuiful, reusable code; it was written as a teaching tool for a talk on CSS animation I gave two years ago at Fronteers.)