[hn3333]

LinkedIn makes communication between users miserable unless you pay. Copyright holders make distribution miserable unless you pay etc.

Not judging any of those as bad, just saying that it's not uncommon for providers of products or services to limit them.

[teddyh]

“Here is another point that helps put the problem of proprietary information in a social perspective. Think about the liability insurance crisis. In order to get any compensation from society, an injured person has to hire a lawyer and split the money with that lawyer. This is a stupid and inefficient way of helping out people who are victims of accidents. And consider all the time that people put into hustling to take business away from their competition. Think of the pens that are packaged in large cardboard packages that cost more than the pen—just to make sure that the pen isn't stolen. Wouldn't it be better if we just put free pens on every street corner? And think of all the toll booths that impede the flow of traffic. It's a gigantic social phenomenon. People find ways of getting money by impeding society. Once they can impede society, they can be paid to leave people alone. The waste inherent in owning information will become more and more important […]” (emphasis mine)

— Richard Stallman, 1986 https://www.gnu.org/gnu/byte-interview