[thewhitetulip]

You are either not Indian or you are ignoring everything to suit your narrative.

The current government has put on a lot of regulation to "protect home grown e-tailers" when Ambani was planning to launch an Amazon competitor.

Flipkart before they sold to Walmart had begged for years to give protection, but none was given, but when JioMart was to be launched, suddenly regulation was changed to benefit local e tailers, major benefactor was JioMart.

> Imagine Tesla being able to open a battery factory in India, and just sell batteries, without worrying about cars and all.

Hahahahahahahaha Due to stuoid red tape, Tesla took Gigafactory plans to China. 70% thungs were need to be locally sourced for starting Tesla factory in India and obviously we don't have the ecosystem.

> By the logic you are stating, any business or market friendly move by any government will have to be targeted at specific individuals or families.

Were you living under a rock when Telecom rules were being constantly flouted by Jio? All rules were specifically created to help Jio. The AGR case crippled telecos except Jio. Jio also has AGR but SC put the decision onto the govt for collecting or not. But others are forced to pay regardless if they go under.

> The car company decides the interface. If a rival chooses to create an open interface, and reap the benefits, market forces will ensure that all manufacturers do the same.

Hahahaha just like "anyone can start a startup in India. They can take Amazon AWS servers and domain from Godaddy and there won't be an issue.

Just like "anyone can apply for a business license and start a manufacturing plant"

You blisfully and maliciously ignore that the entire govt machinery has been working overtime to favour Ambani Adani.

> Moreover, the number of car manufacturers are limited, but the number of battery companies can expand a lot

Yeah and there can be many businesses which you can set up. Sure, all you ought to do is as for a license. Sure, govt won't twist rules to favour JioBattery and JioElectricCar

[kumarvvr]

>protect home grown e-tailers

Protection for them has been around when the previous government was there too. FDI norms were eased only in the fag end of 2012.

Additionally, I agree with protecting home grown e-tailers. Now, perhaps the rules favor Ambani, but breaking up large conglomerates is a different problem.

From the perspective of enacting sound laws and regulation, restricting outside e-tailers and promoting home grown ones is always good, atleast until India is a lot more developed.

> Due to stuoid red tape, Tesla took Gigafactory plans to China.

And thereby ending up supporting an authoritarian regime that mocks human rights, and is actively participating in genocide.

Tesla went to China for cheap labor. Do you think ill-treatment of workers in Chinese factories will be reported by "Independent media" in China?

>anyone can start a startup in India. They can take Amazon AWS servers and domain from Godaddy and there won't be an issue

I don't get it. Yes, anyone can actually make a startup in India, they can hire AWS servers, get domains from GoDaddy and there wont be an issue. I know because I did the same.

>anyone can apply for a business license and start a manufacturing plant

Technically true, but it's still difficult. Even in countries like US, you have to grease a few hands to get things done. Sure, it may be the hands of a Senator, but still you have to do it. I would say the exception is Silicon Valley, but examples like those are few and far between. Even SV spends a lot for lobbying.

>You blisfully and maliciously ignore that the entire govt machinery has been working overtime to favour Ambani Adani.

Far fetched.

>Yeah and there can be many businesses which you can set up. Sure, all you ought to do is as for a license. Sure, govt won't twist rules to favour JioBattery and JioElectricCar

Can you run a business in your country without a license from the govt?

Govt. may twist rules, but the rules currently placed are not twisted. I never said they cannot be twisted in the future.

[thewhitetulip]

So I was right about your malicious intent. You cherry picked 3 lines and twisted their meaning to suit your narrative.

Anything that didn't suit your malicious intent gets ignored totally while your try to divert attention.

> Protection for them has been around when the previous government was there too. FDI norms were eased only in the fag end of 2012.

And yet you totally neglect that when flipkart begged for speific ecommerce protection none was provided

Only when Ambani reacted to launch JioMart was the protection avoided

Also I love how to totally ignored the fact that Jio abused and how the entire govt machinery has favoured Jio

Also how Jio abused and flouted ALL regulatory things and gave free data calls for over one year when the law explicitly forbids it.

I also love how you ignore that the govt pressurized telcos to pay AGR dues while Jio was let out of the payment cycle

> Tesla went to China for cheap labor. Do you think ill-treatment of workers in Chinese factories will be reported by "Independent media" in China?

Well, Modi govt put red tape so much that Tesla chose to go to a country which blatantly copies IP and patents.

Things are that bad.

[kumarvvr]

>Also how Jio abused and flouted ALL regulatory things and gave free data calls for over one year when the law explicitly forbids it.

Jio was questioned and it argued that IUC (Interconnect Usage Charges, the minimum charges that are to levied on the user for a voice call on any Indian cellular network, these charges are charges levied by a network for a call that originates in another network but terminates in its network) was relevant to normal mobile calls, and what Jio was providing was essentially data calls, akin to talking on whatsapp, it can give away free calls.

It's not like it was not questioned, or it did not explain. Also other operators have opposed the free calls issue because they earn quite a bit of revenue from IUC charges, which are basically a tax on allowing users on one network to call users on another network.

So you can make the call, whether Jio actually flouted the rules, or did it make it cheap for everyone to make calls in the market.

As an additional point, TRAI, the main Telecom regulating body in India, has slashed the IUC charges by half in 2018 and is set to be completely removed by December 2020

> I also love how you ignore that the govt pressurized telcos to pay AGR dues while Jio was let out of the payment cycle

AGR dues are just that, dues. Money the companies were supposed to pay, but did not and accumulated the dues. Jio was a new entrant and has significantly lesser dues (195 crores), compared to other players (Airtel, which has been in the market for decades, owes about 44000 crores). All of them were given a time period of 10 years to make staggered payments, payments that they were supposed to pay, but ignored. That is a huge loss for the country. Even in the courts, the companies did not fight about dues, they fought about whether they were responsible for past pending dues on spectrum, that they purchased from other companies.

All companies went to court, when they were asked to pay past dues of spectrum purchased by them recently. Essentially they were asked to pay for the dues accrued on the spectrum, they recently purchased from failing companies.

>And yet you totally neglect that when flipkart begged for speific ecommerce protection none was provided

Flipkart opposed relaxing rules related to FDI norms and asked for specific protections for e-comerce. The rules were relaxed nevertheless.

>Only when Ambani reacted to launch JioMart was the protection avoided

I guess you meant to say 'provided". I would like to know what specific protections were provided to JioMart?

>Well, Modi govt put red tape so much that Tesla chose to go to a country which blatantly copies IP and patents.

>Things are that bad.

I am curious about this also. As far as I remember, Tesla never showed any interest in building a factory in India. However, what exactly are the "red tape so much" that you are talking about?

[thewhitetulip]

> , Tesla never showed any interest in building a factory in India. However, what exactly are the "red tape so much" that you are talking about?

All you have to do is Google. Did you do that?

There are countless tweets and articles about Elon himself replying to Indian Tesla fans that due to Modi govt's inflexible regulation, he can't start a factory in India.

I didn't bother to read the other wall of text since you don't show a propensity to finding out facts which don't fit in your narrative.

[implements]

> Can you run a business in your country without a license from the govt?

As far as I know, businesses don’t require general licences to operate in the United Kingdom.

Licences for certain activities that have an environmental impact may be necessary (significant use of water, potential pollution of air / ground / water, dangerous material handling).

[kumarvvr]

That is the same case in India.

My brother runs a mon-n-pop store, selling stationery items.

Getting a business license took 1 day, one application and renewed every year online. Cost is about 10 USD per year.

I know many in my neighborhood that don't even have that.

Majority of the retailers have a simple license, usually obtained very quickly from local municipal corporation.

I can start a company for consulting, trade, retail, etc, with the help of a legal counsel and a bit of paperwork in about a couple of weeks.