[SamReidHughes]

He said it's the same as

    *(index + arr)

which is correct.

C pointer arithmetic already accounts for object sizes.

And it's sizeof, not size_of. And

    arr + x

is completely different from

    x + *arr

And it's a series of "values".

[marcomonteiro]

I don't know what I was on. Proof positive that sleep depravation does not give me more time to be "productive". Thanks for the correction and apologies for my mistake.

[Jacquass12321]

Always time for a refresher :) http://augustcouncil.com/~tgibson/tutorial/arr.html