[SpaceRaccoon]

It's an important distinction.

> one of his henchmen

There are various clans of power in Russia, and not all of them are loyal, or report, to Putin.

Navalny had a lot of enemies.

> complacent

It's likely. The alternative could lead to some serious instability. For example, evidence suggests Kadyrov took out Nemtsov, but holding Kadyrov accountable could lead to chaos in Chechnya. Is it worth it? This is realpolitik.

[siliconvalley1]

You're failing occams razor. On one hand we have Putin who is very publically Navalny's primary antagonist who also has the means and obvious motive to poison him with Novichuk. On the other some nameless "enemies" who also somehow have the means to build a lab sophisticated enough to produce Novichuk without killing themselves or the people in a large radius of their lab and also access to Mercenaries/Assassins/ex-GRU/Spetsnaz agents with the talent to poison a very high profile person and not be caught?

[tanyatik]

Navalny does have a lot of enemies: if you look at this page https://fbk.info/investigations/ (use Google translate), you will see mentions of dozens of people. He keeps investigating into them in great detail and exposing their illegal wealth. They aren't that nameless, they are rich and powerful people, some of them are sure to have friends within GRU.

Not saying that Putin didn't order it, just pointing out that the group of people with motive and means to do it is bigger than just him.

[SpaceRaccoon]

And yet why did they let him be flown to Germany for treatment?