|
|
|
|
|
by londons_explore
2118 days ago
|
|
The algorithm was the same one used for decades, and previously published. It pretty much says: > You get your exam grade. If that isn't available, you get a grade set by averaging your peers from the same school, with the set of peers decided by a ranking set by your teacher. If that isn't available, you get a grade chosen by your raking in class selected from the distribution of your schools past performance. There isn't really any fairer way that doesn't lead to grade inflation when there is an element of dishonesty/optimism on the part of teachers. We already suffer an element of grade inflation, which causes employers to say things like "You must achieve grade A* in Maths to apply for this job", and applicants from years ago before that grade was even introduced are automatically excluded. |
|
The two systems used are teachers' grade predictions, and the grade-prediction algorithm.
We discussed this two weeks ago at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24191882
[0] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-53810655