[jeffe]

A few caveats to be aware of: more scrutinizing employers will recognize that undergraduate research at the same university you attend is usually a gimme. And at my large state school was often used for cheap labor that grad students didn't want to do.

[throwawaygh]

It’s the project output, the faculty connection, and conference attendance. The line on the resume doesn’t matter.

[derangedHorse]

For the large amount of students who don't go on to get PhDs, why would that matter?

[throwawaygh]

A good rec from a strong researcher carries weight. Likely lots of execs, managers, and senior engineers in the ranks of their academic siblings, old grad school friends, collaborators, former students, etc.

It’ll add a band or at least max out comp in the existing one if the right person gives the right rec.

And that’s assuming the undergrad research project was totally irrelevant to the position. New grads who can contribute to cutting edge stuff are super hard to find and super cheap relatively speaking. Usually your options are super expensive engineers or the few phds who decide to go into engineering instead of research.

I’ve seen undergrads sign in the 3s and 4s when their research aligns perfectly with the advertised position, cause the alternative is often buying the kid out of his startup a year later.