|
|
|
|
|
by 1vuio0pswjnm7
2119 days ago
|
|
Same could be said for software developers. While I am aware of the audience here, I'm not trolling. There is a remarkable similarity between the "helplessness/vulnerability", for lack of a better term, of clients using a lawyer and the helplessness/vulnerability of users in using software authored by someone else (not to mention clients who hire software developers to write software for them). In each case, the client/user is required to trust the lawyer/developer. One key difference is an issue sometimes discussed on HN:- there's no licensing requirement for developers. Lawyers have to be licensed, and the licensing requirements include ethical obligations, violations of which can result in losing one's license. While this system in practice may have some shortcomings, software developers do not have anything equivalent. There are states in the US where lawyers are disbarred every month, but I am not aware of any software developer who has been banned by a regulatory body from writing software for use by others. Both lawyers and developers are probably subject to negative stigmas as as a result of the "bad apples". Not all are unethical. |
|
I am licensed attorney and a full-time software developer and I agree 100% - there are remarkable similarities.
(And there are strong parallels between big tech and biglaw, especially for junior devs/associates, but that's a bit of a tangent)