[nulltype]

I think they've been saying "We haven't yet found a design that gives value proportionate to the complexity, although we continue to think about it." since 2013: https://web.archive.org/web/20130410000959/https://golang.or...

[wtetzner]

That's what they've been saying, but I don't buy it.

I mean, the workarounds are horrible code generation tools and reflection. How were those ever not considered to be more complex than generics?