Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Waterfall 2125 days ago
What is irrational? These batteries have been cloned cheaply so they're already reverse engineered. You can find them all over eBay. If this works on the T430 and x230 it will be very impressive.

I don't think this generation had DRM on the batteries. The new ones did and they're not cracked.

1 comments

> I don't think this generation had DRM on the batteries. The new ones did and they're not cracked.

TIL that there are DRM even on batteries. What a sad state of affairs.

DRM on batteries of expensive electronics seems consumer-friendly to me. Most consumers' experience with battery replacement would be sending it for replacement by a technician. Battery DRM would make it difficult for the consumer to end up with an unsafe battery in their device and pockets.
There's an alternate strand of reality where you're arguing for mandated licensing for kitchen utensils.
I've been replacing batteries in electronic gear since I was all of five years old. I think your average consumer would be able to handle it.
It's no different if you replace it yourself, that's tangential to my point. You'd be sourcing a specialized replacement battery online and there's a risk that the battery you get is an unsafe knockoff.
That is a different problem.

I've also been able to buy non-knock off batteries for just about all electronics up to a few years ago when companies decided that soldered in batteries shorten the time-to-landfill of their products improving their revenues.

Seriously: there is no reason why there could not be a standard form factor for battery cells. If we can do hard drives, CPUs and RAM I'm sure we can do batteries too.

You're still talking past me. A standard form factor won't solve the trust problem.

Most people don't know how to choose a proper hard drive compatible with their M.2 adapter or cable for their USB device. Many people also buy counterfeit USB sticks and SSDs that don't have near the capacity they advertise. You and other tech-literate people aren't the only consumers manufacturers are selling to. Nor are people always sufficiently educated, or living among stores with sufficient reputation to source from a reputable aftermarket vendor for their replacements.

Why not argue for better battery certification and quality control or more tolerant phone designs? You could probably detect low quality batteries with software and sensors and notify the user.
If the companies where open to repair the technician/end user would say "Hey Apple, i need a battery for the 6S" There's no need for DRM.
It doesn't seem consumer friendly to me. Aside from laptop, phone is five years old, replaced (consumer serviceable) battery twice (<$20), re-soldered USB connector once because of worn-out charging ($5, bought on ebay, don't have a solder, friend did it), replaced screen once due to a crack on screen and heavy rain. SD card of course so 8GB phone boosted by very affordable 64GB. Phone was less than $300, upfront no plan, when new.

Very consumer friendly phone.

When counterfeit batteries can explode and cause serious injury or death, I consider any measures to have the device reject counterfeit batteries consumer-friendly.
Same here. What a wonderful world they've built for us, eh?
While we sat here and watched. :P