|
|
|
|
|
by replicant
2126 days ago
|
|
A very formulaic article, start with an anecdote that could fit many other articles (it seems Feynmann always shows up when we are talking about learning), refer to some Twitter conversation, add a formula or graph which provides no insight, sprinkle memes everywhere and that's all. In the end, it seems the entire article can be summarised to, "it is all good to google for some recipes to solve your problems, but you also should care about some deeper understanding". Is there anything else to it? |
|