[petterparker]

Monitors with high refresh rates (usually 140Hz but up to 240Hz) are quite common among gamers these days.

[ekianjo]

And worse than CRT in almost every way.

[t-writescode]

Mass? Real estate? Ergonomics? Power consumption?

[keanebean86]

Also no x-rays

[gerdesj]

Any better than a CRT?

[majormajor]

Not every high-hertz LCD will be better than a CRT in every dimension - black levels and off-angle viewing being the two points that a CRT could hope to lead on - but a 120hz OLED, on the other hand...

[system2]

I have an MSI 32" 2K with 1ms gray-to-gray 144hz refresh rate. My old Philips CRT was 120hz. The new tech is absolutely better.

[ekianjo]

1ms Gray to Gray means nothing since the move from one color to another is not linear in LCDs

[system2]

At least it is mouthful.

[VectorLock]

I'd think so. CRTs could never match the resolution or size what with we see in LCDs today.

[Thaxll]

CRT did have blurry and distorted image.