|
|
|
|
|
by PaulHoule
2119 days ago
|
|
What gets me is that there's something basically wrong with the "Microsoft Word" text editing model. Basically, when you try to set the properties of text (e.g. bold, fonts, ...) there are always anomalous behaviors involving: * if you just start typing what font it is in * selections (why is that the selection region seems to actively avoid the exact selection you want?) There is something fundamentally wrong with the data model behind it that makes it impossible to implement in a way that makes sense 100%. |
|
For your other objection (and maybe what you were also really getting at with your selection objection), maybe you'd like WordPerfect 5.1's "reveal codes"? :-) We can all agree that Microsoft wouldn't have hesitated to steal that feature if it would have benefitted them. The fact that they didn't is proof that formatting markup is something that was historically tried (or considered) and rejected, rather than something waiting to happen in the future.
In any case, for a program as huge as Microsoft Word, I think this is all quite minor. How much of your day is really ruined if you start typing after some bold text, find that the new text is bold when you didn't want it to be, and have to manually turn it off again? It's a fundamental problem with the model, like you said, but has surprisingly tiny impact on usability. If this is your biggest objection, it's almost proof that the program is pretty good. (But I can sympathise with minor objections: I hate copy and paste works differently in Excel then any other program!)