|
|
|
|
|
by throw0101a
2126 days ago
|
|
The conclusion has the line: > […] while EdDSA performs much faster and provides the same level of security with significantly smaller keys. For non-embedded systems, how important is the speed and/or size consideration? Keys are (IIRC) only used on initial contact, and the bulk of traffic operations will use symmetrical algorithms, so it it that big of a deal? Perhaps throwing around a comparatively short "id_ed25519.pub" is easier? |
|
Let's put it this way, ed25519 keys take up this much space:
While RSA 4096 keys take up this much space: In other words ed25519 keys are something you can reasonably expect people to copy-paste and otherwise work with as if they were URLs or content-addresses like md5 file hashs. RSA keys... aren't. You can work around this with keyservers and the like, but that adds more moving parts and more opprotunities for things to break for no reason.