|
|
|
|
|
by kevincox
2123 days ago
|
|
I don't see why we can't have things if they aren't useful to 5% of the population and don't harm the rest. Also the "maybe not as high" comment was about security because you can make an argument that the human review is better. However there doesn't seem to be overwhelming evidence on either side comparing human review to mostly automated. |
|