|
|
|
|
|
|
by h0p3
2129 days ago
|
|
|
That seems to be more about intention, and I'll agree that even style can be intentionally selected, my dude. Perhaps there are larger leftover pieces, gaps, or other footholds to consider here. I'll agree you might not even need a machine, but I am concerned about unjustifiable ML-empowered humans sifting even more effectively for justified dissidence through style, sentiment, and semantic analysis. Do you think this is an arms race that is won by hand? I'm not saying I disagree with you. I want to know more about what you think. |
|
|