[bioipbiop]

Reading through both Nate’s twitter thread and the article, it reads like Nate never read the article. It seems to address every point he brought up in a reasonable manner. Odd.

[OJFord]

Could you link the article? I'm no statistician, but I do find his '50-54% delta is different than 95-99%' compelling.

[bioipbiop]

https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2020/08/14/new-fiveth...