If you're going to take the time to respond to the throwaway portion of the comment, why not respond to the actual counterpoint which was the reason for the comment?
That's absurd. Your parent post said, "most society sectors that happens to be outside America". All it takes to disprove is a few examples. I showed you a search link to pages of them.
Don't be lazy, blaming others for an unscientific bias in your own post is a logical fallacy.
Why do you keep changing the subject of the discussion?
First, you wrote that most police and police unions are not antagonistic towards sectors outside of the usa.
Now, you wrote what is called a red-herring or a strawman.
You made a very strong but incorrect statement at first. Strong statements are easy to debunk, just with a little proof. I provided a link to pages of that. It's very telling that you now characterize that as "one case every four year average". That's telling, indeed.