|
|
|
|
|
by oneelectron
2129 days ago
|
|
SPACs are 30 years old. See the history section here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special-purpose_acquisition_co... They also have a poor reputation, and for what seems like a good reason. It's a risky proposal that generally attracts a get-rich-quick kind of community. Examine the Nikola company and tell me how comfortable you'd be investing a sizeable chunk of your net worth in that. I can't predict the future, but I can bet $10k I will die before SPACs get to even half of VC funding. Side pot of $1k that 50% of them fail their investors, and another side pot that one in the next decade will be a historically spectacular failure. |
|
Look at the recent S-1 filings...there are already 64 “acquisiton” firms that have filed in August alone https://sec.report/Form/S-1
Is this a short term SPAC bubble? Very possible. But SPAC investors and founders are much wiser now, and if done right it’s entirely possible to completely side step traditional VC if the “good ones” prove to be successful.