|
|
|
|
|
|
by nailer
2131 days ago
|
|
|
> nitpicking out individualized acts of violence to discredit a large, decentralized movement That would forbid criticism of any violent decentralized movement. > There's a strong false equivalency being deployed there. I don't think there's any equivalency. There's no widespread looting and assault from the center or the right here. Antifa specifically are willing to use violence to suppress disbelievers as part of their manifesto, and have handbooks re: playing to the invisible audience, goading people into fight responses, etc. However I suspect you know this already. And that you're doing that it now. |
|
|
Establish a pattern of behavior?
> There's no widespread looting and assault from the center or the right here.
I know it's low hanging fruit but do you find this compelling?: https://www.businessinsider.com/right-wing-extremists-kill-3...
> and have handbooks re: playing to the invisible audience, goading people into fight responses, etc.
Who is antifa??? More FUD. This is, in my opinion, a very lazy and poorly researched argument against the anti-fascist movement. Especially in a country where crime reporting is run through an institution with ties to white supremacy and roots in crushing strikes and capturing escaped slaves. Show me the data. Show me the pattern of left wing terror.
> And that you're doing that it now.
Not even touching this..
Oh also, are you sure you've been seeing literature from the "real" "antifa"? https://www.cbsnews.com/news/twitter-fake-antifa-acount-whit...