|
|
|
|
|
by klhugo
2135 days ago
|
|
I'm in the middle of a PhD myself, so take my opinion with a grain of salt. I actually agree with the author, certain fields are just very complex to develop a solid understand without proper mentoring and support you would get as a grad student. That said, maybe the real issue is not the fact we need two PhDs each, but the question I want to raise, do PhDs need to take 4/5/6 years? (I'm not even considering the cases where people, like myself, do a 2 year master program before the PhD...). Honestly, in my humble opinion, it is not necessary. Maybe universities could develop "industry focused dual PhD programs" to target specifically crazy folks like us :) This might be something worth to fight for. |
|
One of many hiccups is in the submitting and review process. It takes ages. Sure, some areas are less, some are more, but three year long submit/review periods are not unheard of. Reviewers want another experiment, another control, they don't get back to you until February even though you submitted in mid-November, you can forget August as a working month, etc. Unless your PI is well connected, getting published takes forever.
I have a paper that has been in reviewer hell for the last seven years, for example. It's nutters.