|
|
|
|
|
by leotaku
2136 days ago
|
|
I would imagine the book contains a bit more justification for its arguments than what was presented by the person you are responding to. What makes you believe that the author just "wrote basic observations and concluded they are the root cause of everything"? Most ideas are easy to dismiss when you assume that a blurb posted to HN is all there is to them. |
|