As with other impacts of shutdown and quarantine, shifts in demand and consumption patterns can mean that infrastructure isn't able to supply electricity to where it's specifically needed. It's been pointed out that electricity is not storable --- it's less an energy store as with fuel and far more energy distribution as with a transmission or driveshaft, but with far more connections. Not only must the Grid make power available when it is needed, but it must do so where.
Peak daytime demands in urban cores, offices, and factories is different from peak demands in residential exurbs, purely on distribution, even if quantity is comparable.
Your comment is completely correct in general, but I'll add that based on the information released by CAISO for this incident, it appears to have been caused by insufficient generation capacity to meet demand at the state level, not constraints on specific transmission or distribution circuits.
CAISO declared insufficient operating reserve (the generation capacity that is available to quickly ramp up or down to match load and generation), which forced them to drop load to get back within safe operating margins. It's better to do this than let the system get into an insecure state where a forced outage may cause cascading failures.
The ISO requires load curtailments, use of Interruptible Loads* and
requests Out-of-Market (OOM) and Emergency Energy from all available sources.
Maximum conservation efforts are requested.
Spinning Reserves have depleted or are forecast to deplete to levels below
minimum requirements. Load curtailments are required and will continue until
such time as sufficient Spinning Reserves are available.
Residential solar once posed the opposite problem: generating power during the day in suburbs where it wasn't being consumed nor could it be transported to areas of high demand.
If our current problem is higher daytime residential demand, maybe power companies can stop fighting residential solar initiatives now?
As I understand it, the problem was evening demand, not daytime and that's probably also the real reason why all the empty office buildings aren't helping - most people would probably be out of the office and back home by them. If anything, residential solar makes this problem worse both by making non-solar generation less financially viable and causing a sharp increase in demand for it during the evening as the sun goes down.
There's a heat wave up and down the entire western US. Everyone from San Diego to Seattle is at home running their A/C if they're lucky enough to have one.
I wonder if the climate control units in office buildings have even been switched off when not in use.
I know that nobody turned off the one in our office when we were away from it for 6 weeks during the NZ lockdown.
It’s not remotely managed and we are not allowed to touch it so someone from the company that owns the building would have had to go and do that, and then come back later to turn it on again. And maybe some of the other businesses in the building are essential and have workers? No idea.
Most office climate control systems are still running, although perhaps at a reduced setting. Shutting them off could cause mold growth and equipment damage.
> I wonder if the climate control units in office buildings have even been switched off when not in use.
even if they're on, there'll be much less for them to do. fewer people opening doors, fewer bodies producing heat, less non-HVAC electrical demand (much of which ends up as heat).
Peak daytime demands in urban cores, offices, and factories is different from peak demands in residential exurbs, purely on distribution, even if quantity is comparable.