|
|
|
|
|
|
by qubex
2138 days ago
|
|
|
An “impolite no” is not just a ‘no’, and it’s the latter that was required and not the former. He could have ‘recommended’ that the whole patch-set be re-architected to avoid depending on the proprietary module. There was really no need (or any excuse really) for being so coarse. |
|
|