|
The pro-riot side of the discussion also wishes to point out that by the legal definition of a riot, an assembly of three[1] or more people, where one of them engages in graffiti is... A riot. By that definition, there isn't a single protest, that can't, in thirty seconds, be turned by a drunken idiot, an agent provocateur, or an undercover cop into a riot. (Which immediately justifies the use of flashbangs, firing less-lethal rubber-coated bullets into crowds, and flooding the entire street with tear gas.) The Hong Kong protests, under American law, would be considered riots. The folks tagging federal CCP buildings would, under American law, have been eligible for up to ten years in federal prison. [2] Strangely enough, most of people demanding for crackdowns against domestic protests are also endorsing the protests in Hong Kong. [1] https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2102 [2] https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/detroit/2019... |