Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by devcpp 2137 days ago
You can be pragmatic and utilitarian and support privacy and free use of encryption. I would instead qualify his mindset of shortsighted.
2 comments

Anyone who rigorously follows an ethical framework will eventually be lead to some conclusion(s) they dislike; utilitarianism is no guarantee of satisfaction.

An honest utilitarian would be willing to share their calculations, which would be interesting to see, though I am not sure how you'd balance the interests in the cases described above.

>Anyone who rigorously follows an ethical framework will eventually be lead to some conclusion(s) they dislike

I've fallen into this trap. It led me to realize that, like ideologies, all frameworks are flawed. Assuming otherwise leads to positions that are starved for empathy and compassion - and that are ultimately counterproductive.

His view is both utilitarian and short sighted. They don't always go together but they often do since there isn't time enough to work everything out from first principles.
If everyone was short-sighted, privacy would be easier to enforce.
Yes, that is certainly true and rather scary since people are quite short sighted and currently in a mood for doing things for the greater good while sacrificing individual freedoms.