I am from the UK and lived in California and you don't know what your talking about. The food is much much better than the UK. Almost anywhere has better food than the UK (except bacon and pies). Cheap chicken is is terrible in the UK, I expect it's awful in US too. You are self delusional if you think UK can lecture other countries on food standards, it's a running joke across the world of the low quality of UK cooking [1]. I agree.
Hey man, I am from the UK and used to live in the states (north east though, not california). Yes, the quality of food in the USA can be VERY good, especially if you shop at places like wholefoods. The problem tends to be with the cheaper food.
In the UK, I would feel safe eating the cheapest chicken from Tesco, Alsdi, Lidl and ASDA (which is owned by Walmart). Would I feel safe eating chicken from the cheaper supermarkets in the USA? Definitely not.
I don't think the UK should be lecturing other countries, and at no point did I say we should.
Also, how dare you insult fish and chips, half and halfs, and fried mars bars :p
Finally, I would just like to point out that I did say I love the USA, I'm looking at moving back (post-covid). It's one of my favourite countries in the world, but I'm surprised at how controversial it is to say that the food isn't the best.
Yes I love vinigar on chips and fried haggis but it's an acquired taste / Stockholm syndrome :)
The US food IS the best though (avacados). Maybe also simultaneously the worst (corn syrup) but I just feel UK has nothing to add to the disucussion and its too close to the lazy US stereotype Europeans throw around about Americans.
Currently, the UK suffers under the cruel tyranny of European food safety regs, but after WONDERFUL BREXIT it’ll be allowed have its own salmonella-y onions, because Consumer Choice. Or I think that’s the narrative, anyway.
This is nothing to do with cuisine or even food quality; it’s about food safety. The UK will soon no longer have to obey EU rules and is under pressure to relax its standards as part of a potential trade deal with the US.
Bear in mind that food poisoning isn’t free. It is not in society’s interest to have people off work sick, taking up medical capacity, and dying early. The advances in food safety over the 20th and 21st century was a great social good, and backsliding would be bad.
I do think that one problem, particularly in societies like the US where people don’t go to their GP very frequently, is that it’s pretty hard to measure impacts, because there’s little reliable data on mild (but economically impactful) cases.
The question should be: would lowering food standards make any difference?
Specifically in this case, in order to do a trade deal with a different continent, so the increased costs of transport are relevant.
I’m also told supermarket prices are very different from wholesale (and therefore import) prices. If so I would therefore expect any cost change to alter profit margins rather than family shopping bills.
Are you implying that the UK won't have enough food to feed itself post-Brexit, to the extent that it would need to import food from the US? I thought that the problem was that the US might insist on relaxing food safety regulations as part of a larger trade deal package. Do correct me if I'm wrong.
The question isn't the quantity of food, but the cost of food. There can be food aplenty, but if poor people need to spend a large amount of their income to acquire it, there will be a benefit to having a wider sourcing of cheaper food.
I think the difference is that the BSE crisis caused massive regulatory change, with farming, slaughter and rendering practices dramatically changes across a continent. Whereas the US does seem to just have this sort of thing routinely.
I was ill twice on beef in the UK - and never once in places like France where one eats raw beef with a raw egg on it. I had beef in restaurants twice in several years of living in the UK, and twice I was ill. It was very well done, as well.
English vegetables are served in two forms: raw, boiled to smithereens. I guess I wouldn't have been poisoned by onions, luckily, given those appetizing options.
Now, Waitrose, the pricey British supermarket chain, is absolutely superb, and blows away, yes, Trader Joes and certainly Whole Foods by an exponential factor. You get fresh vegetables and fruit and products from all over the EU, with varietals and country origin listed.
But I'll trade our dangerous onions for your mysterious* meat any day of the week.
* - while I was there a scandal had been discovered: there was horsemeat mixed in with ground beef being sold in supermarkets and served in restaurants. Maybe I'm allergic to horse?
The UK compares quite favourably to the US when it comes to salmonella infections from eggs. According to Wikipedia, "142,000 people in the United States are infected each year with Salmonella Enteritidis from chicken eggs". The number in the UK is a few dozen. That's a substantial difference per capita. Calling it a "large" salmonella outbreak is definitely glass houses.
I feel that some of the "tu quoque" responses to GP are fuelled by US nationalism.
> I feel that some of the "tu quoque" responses to GP are fuelled by US nationalism.
Or just fueled by the relatively constant stream of smug "here is yet another reason Europe is better than the US" posts from people who frequently turn out to be speaking from a position of ignorance. There is plenty of nationalism to go around, and it gets tiring.
Calling 200+ infections "a few dozen" seems intentionally misleading. And that was just with a single outbreak in November. Whose cause is still not known.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html