[paulcole]

There’s so many things I find disturbing that whether my is Google speaker is listening to me doesn’t even crack the Top 10.

What’s the negative outcome? I don’t believe this is the start of an inevitable slippery slope decline into a Big Brother surveillance state.

Yeah maybe they’ll get more data and target ads better, but that’s a good thing. I want to know about products that might interest me and then buy them!

[Brakenshire]

The infrastructure of the Big Brother surveillance machine is the same as the infrastructure of the target-ads-better machine, the only difference is who is in charge of it. And relying solely on our current mechanisms to prevent the system being co-opted is naive. Especially given it’s already public record that some of these mechanisms have already been co-opted.

Also, that is just talking about the worst outcome, there are plenty of horrible possible intermediate outcomes, with the data being sold without restriction or not properly protected.

[paulcole]

> there are plenty of horrible intermediate steps which could happen

I just don’t believe any of these are particularly horrible when considered in the context of the assorted horrors of the world today.

[beardedwizard]

you can't imagine the problem of having your private conversations recorded, then a business compelled to release them without a warrant? You can't imagine what inferences might be made about your personal conversations and sold to others? I do not think you are giving the words you say enough credit.

[paulcole]

Of course I can imagine those problems! Those problems are brought up literally every time I mention that in-home speakers are not the end-of-the-world-nightmare-scenario so many people treat them as.

I just don’t particularly care.

Also if someone wants to cut out the middleman and buy my personal conversations directly, feel free to reach out. Great value! Last night I talked about weed and Top Chef!

[sukilot]

Enjoy your privilege of not being interesting or important enough to be the target of criminal activity or government opppression. Millions of people aren't so lucky, and they deserve empathy as they work to build a better world for you to carelessly enjoy.

[Kiro]

The privilege is that you have so few real problems that this is something you have time to worry about. The millions of people you talk about couldn't care less since they have immediate non-hypothetical problems to focus on.

[cameronbrown]

How is other people's lives their responsibility?

[scrollaway]

Empathy is everyone's responsibility, yours included.

[Forbo]

[flagged]

[cameronbrown]

So GP is a sociopath for choosing to use a Google Home?

[mellow2020]

So, not caring because because oneself is not being persecuted at this minute, and determined to err on the side of being no threat to any criminals or people who persecute others, ever, and to hand that "value" down the generations. I could get more eloquent descriptions of that argument from history books, and don't even care for those.

[elliekelly]

I will purchase access to and broadcasting rights for all conversations that take place in your home. Name your price.

[paulcole]

$1,000 a day seems fair.

[elliekelly]

Well that hardly seems like a discount for cutting out the Googley middle man! Perhaps you do indeed value your privacy a bit more than you realize?

[paulcole]

It’s called negotiating. What’s your best offer?

[titzer]

I hope you never witness a government official commit a crime and consider blowing the whistle.

[paulcole]

I hope so too!

[beardedwizard]

And if weed became illegal again? Hmmmmmmmmm

[dragonwriter]

> And if weed became illegal again?

“became...again”? When did the federal prohibition of weed end?

[beardedwizard]

Exactly.