|
|
|
|
|
by PaulDavisThe1st
2140 days ago
|
|
I don't think we're going to know in just 10 years. Maybe 50, or 100. For myself, I definitely sense that we (collectively, or nation by nation) could have followed various pathways (and to some extent, we did). The "right" answer was (and is) not known, and we had a choice between erring on the side of caution over the damage caused by the disease versus that caused by economic disruption. For now, I'm still in favor of erring in the direction of caution over the disease impact, but will concede that history may judge things quite differently. |
|
That’s just a piece of the all cause mortality due to the COVID response.
And then after accepting all that direct cost, then you can start evaluating the economic damage on top (which to some extent is unavoidable regardless of lockdown policy).