[klyrs]

True, it's not just a photo; it's also a request to identify a police officer, which has legitimate purposes.

Unless you think that calling a police officer a bitch is a felony.

[MaximumYComb]

Worded as such it does appear threatening. If someone tweeted that about me I would feel worried about my personal safety and that of my family. The law specifically states that placing a reasonable person in fear for their safety via online communications is a crime.

If you're going to request personal information for a legitimate reason then you should word it in a non threatening manner.

[kn0where]

IRL, cops behave far more threateningly than calling someone a “bitch” on Twitter, and yet they don’t get charged.

[op00to]

You aren’t a public official. Police officers are. You’re entitled to privacy. Police officers on official duties are not.

[stonogo]

What is the threat?

[MrZongle2]

"...it's also a request to identify a police officer, which has legitimate purposes."

And given the context of calling a police officer a "bitch", do you think the requester was doing so to accurately file a complaint... or doing so in the hope that armed with the cop's identity, somebody would engage in harassment of that man and/or his family?

Being charged with a felony for the tweet is absurd.

But painting this as an innocent request for information is almost equally so.

[klyrs]

> And given the context of calling a police officer a "bitch", do you think the requester was doing so to accurately file a complaint...

To be honest, I read that tweet as fairly ordinary use of vernacular and I wouldn't assume malicious intent.