Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by theamk 2142 days ago
If one is using attestation and independent verification, then I agree.

But this is not what the article says. It specifically mentions "Confidential VMs." and says "giving customers a simple, easy-to-use option". Looking up the actual product, they strongly recommend using google-provided images.

So this particular announcement does not change much. You still need the trust the cloud provider to not introduce backdoors.

And I bet that all the pre-made images will have "https://packages.cloud.google.com/apt" in the sources.list -- so if Google wants to snoop on you, all they need is to ship a backdoored package. And if this does not work, they may send you a regular email saying "the physical host is failing, please reboot to migrate" -- and when you reboot, it will be not in the protected mode.

So yes, the general idea of "Confidential Computing" is sound, but reading the post carefully shows the current system is just for making non-technical people excited.