|
|
|
|
|
by jtr1
2144 days ago
|
|
Damore's evidence was by turns cherry picked, misinterpreted, and unrepresentative of mainstream understanding in the fields it came from. You can read plenty of those researchers complaining about his use of their work. His synthesis is about as scientific as phrenology. |
|
Which ones?
Your edit is even more misleading and incoherent than your original comment.