|
|
|
|
|
|
by jerf
2146 days ago
|
|
|
Hypothetically yes, but I'm not sure any common fuzzing strategy would catch that. Pure random mutations would never get this far, and code-coverage based mutation won't either. How to create a strategy that would catch this but not be rife with false positives and wasted fuzzing time is not immediately obvious. |
|
|