|
|
|
|
|
by azernik
2141 days ago
|
|
1. Yes. Not just state actors - Planet Labs (https://www.planet.com/) in San Francisco, for example, is a commercial satellite company that photographs the whole globe once per day and sells that imagery online. 2. Live feed is a bit tricky, and that's where governments have an advantage - they own their own satellites, and can task them to follow a specific target. But you have to know where the target is at the start of the window, they don't have real-time video of the whole planet, and unless you've got a very big fleet you won't always have a satellite overhead when you want to look at your target. 3. Keeping track of the times of satellite passes overhead, hiding stuff underground, putting your aircraft in covered hangars and only moving them at night, putting a roof on your military docks, using upwards-facing camouflage, etc. Same methods that have been used for a hundred years to hide from air surveillance. |
|
In the theoretical world where every inch of the earth was photographed every day things like losing MH-17 likely wouldn't have happened.
ETA: Planet claims "entire landmass" every day but I find that claim extremely suspect, but it does not even claim the entire globe.