|
|
|
|
|
by dragontamer
2149 days ago
|
|
Can you elaborate? The two major extensions of our electorate were (former) slaves and then women. Do you believe that these groups are more easily manipulated? Or are you talking about some other group that I forgot about? |
|
I believe this had several intents behind it; one of them was of course just plain-old elitism/cronyism, but I think there were also some elements of using it as a proxy for education, shared-culture, and (presumed) fiscal responsibility.
There also was probably a surprisingly pragmatic problem of logistics; a small register of settled-down property owners was probably far easier to collect votes from that a wild array of migrant laborers, whalers, fur-trappers, and frontiersmen.
(Yeah, I just checked up on this, and it looks like this was gradually abolished, over the course of the century before the civil war, on a state-by-state basis: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_rights_in_the_United_St... )