|
|
|
|
|
by wvenable
2148 days ago
|
|
Isn't there proof? I mean there are plenty of alternative programming paradigms -- some that have been around since the 60's and still promoted as alternatives today. Where is that success to compare? Show me that an alternative to OOP is statically more successful and I'll switch tomorrow. It seems like you really want it out to be merely popularity rather than being simply successful. That's not a rational position. |
|