|
|
|
|
|
by doukdouk
2143 days ago
|
|
In this case, the deworming treatment was allocated randomly (see the paper [0]). Giving the deworming treatment to children make them less poor than those who did not get the treatment, and there should be no baseline differences on average between the two group of children since the allocation was random. Is going from "deworming children make less poor" to "the worms cause poor outcomes" such a stretch? [0] http://emiguel.econ.berkeley.edu/research/twenty-year-econom... |
|
Is going from "deworming children make less poor" to "the worms cause poor outcomes" such a stretch?
Sure, it is likely.