|
|
|
|
|
by orwin
2141 days ago
|
|
> First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out because I was not a socialist... Thank you for this. I understand your view better like this. This is my point of view:
I use my money and my time however i want. No one should feel entitled enough tell me if i am allowed to boycott a product. This is why i don't think it is cancelling and that you are doing the term a disservice:
Neither i nor 488643689 did say "don't use and/or participate with this product, he is transphobe". 488643689 just informed me, and others, of the product owner views on trans people, and that he cofounded spinster.xyz (which is a TERF platform). Our society and economy is build on the myth of homo economicus. That people will take the best decision for them with the right informations. Having this information without haviong to dig in makes everyone stronger and able to make better decision. Preventing someone to do business with perfectly informed economic actor is totalitarism. But informing people about the personnal deed of a product owner, not shaming them if they still engage with him, is something you should absolutely do if you believe in liberal capitalism. |
|