No need for the dollar sign in the second example :)
A nice thing about Haskell list comprehensions is they're based on a trivial transformation to monad syntax, which makes it easier to factor out complex list transformations into multiple little bites. I've run into this problem in Python. Also, Python list comprehensions can often behave very unexpectedly due to mutability.
Here's an example of the monad syntax:
[(x,y) | x <- [1..10], y <- [1..x], odd (x + y)]
equiv
do
x <- [1..10]
y <- [1..x]
guard $ odd (x + y)
return (x,y)
Lots of combinatorics problems can be elegantly solved using the list monad like that.
Haskell's list comprehensions actually started off as more general monad comprehensions, were later restricted to lists, and are back behind a GHC language pragma.
A nice thing about Haskell list comprehensions is they're based on a trivial transformation to monad syntax, which makes it easier to factor out complex list transformations into multiple little bites. I've run into this problem in Python. Also, Python list comprehensions can often behave very unexpectedly due to mutability.
Here's an example of the monad syntax:
equiv Lots of combinatorics problems can be elegantly solved using the list monad like that.