[hlfy_hn]

China's strength was never cheap labour.

1. Educated people (most former communist countries have fewer analphabets than the US)

2. Tons of people

3. Infrastructure and clustering.

4. The political will to move forward.

You won't see this in Africa. India is possible but unlikely.

[lostlogin]

> analphabet Illiterate. I initially thought it an amusing typo, and I haven’t missed the irony in not knowing the word. Thanks, I learned something.

[hlfy_hn]

Sorry, I am not a native speaker.

[lostlogin]

Don't be sorry. You taught a native speaker a new word.

[hlfy_hn]

Nut sure why this is also downvoted. Feel free to disagree. I have a PhD in a STEM field and live in China. I think my opinion has some value.

[racecar789]

It's a fine comment (and I learned a new word also).

Take the down-votes in stride. Topics about China often stir-up strong political emotions.

[waterheater]

Currently doing a PhD in a STEM field in the USA.

I think your points are generally right but vastly oversimplifies the situation.

>1. Educated people (most former communist countries have fewer analphabets than the US)

Literacy != education. In the USA, we used to talk about the 3 R's: reading, 'riting, and 'rithmetic. That's the base level. I would equate education with higher-level thought processes developed in college. Re communist countries: yes, this is where communist control can be effective, but it also stifles creative thought (are you really sure the state's education regime is correct?)

>2. Tons of people

Certainly helpful, when used correctly. Definitely drives the cost of labor lower, though (simple supply-demand relationship).

>3. Infrastructure and clustering.

To an extent, sure, but the infrastructure development is more a consequence of the large amounts of people. Also, you get more bang for the buck when you build infrastructure there because so many people now live in population centers.

>4. The political will to move forward.

This is the primary point I would say is wrong. We have plenty of political will in the USA. However, we also have much clearer legal separation between private and public companies. The CCP holds a very different view on how private companies should exist. We in the USA theoretically can block companies from operating in certain countries, but we choose to not do so in most cases. Liberty is much more protected in the USA, which may hurt short term but works best long term.

As to your projections:

>won't see this in Africa

I presently agree, but no one expected China to do as well as it has 50 years ago.

>India is possible but unlikely

As China and India continue their border clashes, they will grow more distant. I expect the West to align with India than China, given than Indian values more closely align with the West.

[hlfy_hn]

"Literacy != education."

Irrelevant for many jobs. What to do with people who can not read?

"Certainly helpful, when used correctly. Definitely drives the cost of labor lower, though"

Why should this be the case? The labor is probably lower in Benin. Yet, nobody moves there.

">3. Infrastructure and clustering. To an extent, sure"

No. In fact there was a study from a business school that showed that this is the most important point about China. Clustering. All the suppliers and sub-suppliers that can work hand in hand.

">4. The political will to move forward. This is the primary point I would say is wrong. We have plenty of political will in the USA."

As a immigrant in both systems and a naturalized US citizen I tell you that this is not my impression.

[waterheater]

>What to do with people who can not read?

They can do jobs which don't require high literacy rates. Farming is such an example. The USA has plenty of Mexican immigrants who don't know English yet are still highly capable at performing manual labor.

Also, as a counterexample to your point about former communist states leaving higher literacy rates: a Marxist-Leninist state existed in Benin until 1990, but they still have one of the lowest literacy rates in the world [1].

>Why should this be the case? The labor is probably lower in Benin. Yet, nobody moves there.

The principle is just supply and demand. If you increase labor supply and keep demand stable, the cost of labor decreases (on the other end of this spectrum, tight labor markets drive wages higher).

But considering why Benin isn't the manufacturing powerhouse of the world (with only 11.3 million people) is tightly coupled with political realities. For example: does their country need those manufacturing jobs? CAN the country support those jobs? Apparently cotton is 40% of Benin's GDP and ~80% of their official exports. Political instability in Africa generally hurts all other African nations. Perhaps the African Union will help them [2].

>All the suppliers and sub-suppliers that can work hand in hand.

Oh, clustering is highly effective. There's plenty of clustering in the USA as well. That said, the CCP has much more control over all industries, so they can force clustering with greater ease. Ascribing economic success to clustering oversimplifies the broader context.

>As a immigrant in both systems and a naturalized US citizen I tell you that this is not my impression.

Well, as a person born and raised in the USA and surrounded by hard-working immigrant family members, I attest otherwise. Mainstream news in both China and the USA is manufactured and does not reflect the reality of how people feel. People here want change, and it's coming.

Sources:

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benin#Education

[2] https://au.int/

[api]

The political will to move forward is a great counterpoint to my original post, and I disagree that the USA has a lot of that. If anything the USA seems ruled by an entrenched political caste wedded deeply to old ideas and old ways of doing things and much too comfortable.

A lot of people who don't ordinarily vote R voted for Trump in the hope that at least he'd shake some things up. (I didn't, but I can't blame them all that much.) Most of them are very disappointed and won't be voting for him again, but that leaves Biden who is yet another member of that same calcified political class.

Maybe we just have to wait for them all to retire or die off. Sad, but might be true. People can continue to learn and grow as they age, but it seems like a lot of people choose not to. At some point they decide they know everything and are right about everything and they just stop there.

I disagree about India though. India has loads of talent. They have corruption and other issues but so does China and so do we. Africa is further behind but I'm bullish on it over a long (25-50 year) time frame. Values and culture wise Africa is probably a lot closer to the USA than many people would imagine... or at least that's the impression I get. Africa seems to be slowly becoming politically stable, and political instability is historically the reason Africa has remained so dysfunctional. Who wants to invest in a place where the next perennial revolution might destroy everything?

[waterheater]

>If anything the USA seems ruled by an entrenched political caste wedded deeply to old ideas and old ways of doing things and much too comfortable.

Replace "old ideas and old ways of doing things and much too comfortable" with "power", and I'll agree 100% percent.

>Most of them are very disappointed and won't be voting for him again

Based on my discussions with Trump supporters, I don't see that. In fact, they're very happy with his performance and feel his job is made intentionally hard because of political opposition. If anything, their resolve to vote for his has been strengthened.

Also, these people will NOT vote for Biden. They watched him during his past decades in politics and can see his mental decline clear as day. Voting for Biden is basically guaranteeing Section 4 of the 25th Amendment will be invoked for the first time ever.