No. A single long exposure would only show maybe one or two of those satellites. That's numerous exposures stacked on top of each other, such that every satellite visible in any of them is in the final result. This is completely backwards from how photo stacking is meant to be done (it's meant to remove satellites not visible in all of them.)
Very interesting, thanks for sharing this. This indeed should be pointed out clearky by whomever creates such images - seems quite manipulative using this to make a point.