|
|
|
|
|
by philmcc
2142 days ago
|
|
Not touching the whole heft of the argument, I would like to point out that the original poster didn't compare the difficulty of writing a hit song to a "hit app", he compared a creating a hit song with creating working software. I can co-sign on this part of his premise. I worked for a music producer who has a number of #1 hits (Beyonce, Fergie, John Legend etc). He wrote >1 songs per day almost every day for over a decade. His success ratio (hit vs placement vs nothing) was much lower than any mediocre software engineer trying to make working software over the same period of time. It feels safe to say that in a 365 day period, a software developer can reasonably expect significantly more than one of those days to be used in 'working software' right? |
|
"Working software" would be comparable to "listenable music". I'm sure every song that producer wrote daily was listenable.
But even if you mean "working software" as something that goes up on the app charts, top 100 in a popular category? I mean, then no -- I could easily see a developer spend an entire year building 1, 10, or even 100 apps and have none of them gain any traction at all.