|
|
|
|
|
by kashug
2149 days ago
|
|
Many places where I have seen people wanting to introduce UBI, increased (flat percentage) tax is often also suggested. The percentage is then suggested to be set at a level so that: - People at low average income will have more money (the UBI-increase will be higher than the tax-increase) - Average income: You get as much as before. - Higher income: you pay more in taxes than you get from UBI. Basically it ends up being a way to move money from the ones with higher incomes to the ones with less. It will ofc still give some inflation as poor people have more funds for basic needs. But other people will have less - and the average person just as much as before. Limiting the effect of the inflation. |
|
- Low income housing costs will probably inflate because all poor people will have an extra $1000 to spend. - Avocado costs probably won't rise, as middle classes will have the same spending power - Bentley and yacht prices might decrease as the rich have less spending power.
So you haven't helped the poor. You've created the usual issue with socialism/communism that in the end all it does is pull everyone down, rather than lift anyone up.
If that's your goal, fine, admit that you hate the rich. But the marketing promises of UBI are not that, they are about helping the poor.