|
|
|
|
|
by BoiledCabbage
2148 days ago
|
|
To be clear, your argument is: "I'd rather be able to get 30-60 free articles a month, than 5-10." Not exactly earth shattering here. You want more free. So do many people. Regardless of how little or much of it you'd consume, you're still asking for more of their content to be available free. Or put another way: "I'd like to ensure I can read all I want from them without paying anything. Please update your "free" policies to make my particular consumption pattern completely free." With the implied, "If I did start reading 3 articles (instead of 1-2) on the the occasional days I land on your website, I'd also like you to up your daily free limit to 3 at that point." Journalism is a profession and a business. This idea that I should be paid for my work, but nobody else should be paid for theirs is particularly poor for society. |
|